TOW 19: Visual

The second amendment may protect American's right to bear arms, but that doesn't change the fact that gun violence is responsible for the deaths of 30,000 Americans each year. In this ad by gun control activists Moms Demand Action, the images of two children holding two very different objects are juxtaposed. One child holds a Kinder Egg, a popular European treat where a toy is encased in a chocolate egg, and the other an assault rifle; however, only one is banned--the Kinder Egg. This ad effectively shows the absurdity of gun laws: that a seemingly harmless toy is banned to protect children, but deadly fire arms are not. It would seem through this ad that the banning of assault rifles is an obvious necessity in the U.S. However, the author's goal of banning assault weapons in this ad has yet to reach fruition, and in fact probably never will. 

After each mass shooting that occurs in what seems like more frequent increments, there happens to be a period of time where Americans express their outrage regarding lax gun laws. And each time, it seems as if there might be progress made regarding the regulation of guns; however, no matter how many times outrage is expressed, there will never be any progress made. While this seems pessimistic, it is merely the unfortunate truth that is the consequence of a bitter and unbending system. Anti-gun activists continually advocate for gun bans similar to those in Australia and GB, however gun rights groups like the NRA hold so much sway within the American political machine that not even background checks will be approved by congress. The paranoid American is in constant fear of Big Brother taking away their second amendment rights, and this leads them to be against any form of gun regulation. Due to this, even the most minuscule goals of groups like Moms Demand Action such as banning extended magazines will never be reached.  

It seems obvious in this advert and to the majority of the first world that guns and absolute safety cannot coexist. Despite this, the fearful pro-Second-Amendment fervor of Americans will keep any progress from being made. So for now we will saved from the abomination that is a Kinder Egg, but at least we will be able to carry our heavy duty, extended magazine assault rifles. 

TOW #18: Is Trump Unstoppable?

When orange-faced-filter-lacker Donald Trump announced his campaign for presidency what seems like eons ago, we all thought it was a joke. What did this loud, touped, casino monger think he was doing in politics? He'd never last... or so we thought. But, unfortunately for women, Muslims, blacks, hispanics, minorities in general, and basically anyone with a modicum of respect for the American political system, Trump is still going strong--and getting stronger. This underdog--if the word underdog can be used to describe a white anglo millionaire--has led the polls non-stop for months and has won primaries in New Hampshire and now South Carolina. As the nation watches Trump seemingly run away with the Republican nomination, one question (raised by David Graham in The Atlantic) remains: is this angry human Dorito without a volume setting unstoppable? As much as I and many others would hate to believe it, the answer for now is unfortunately yes.

The Republican nomination will go to Trump not because of his careful oration and pandering skills (seemingly winning traits in any other candidate) but because of the opposite: he says whatever he wants. Trump is a filter-less, anti-PC gladiator in the primetime-network-news-channel-Republican-debate Thunderdome. Frightened turtle in disguise Jeb Bush and chew toy Marco Rubio have become Trump's ragdolls: they act as the pussyfooting establishment foils to Trump's blunt, dark horse honesty. Trump has said many things that would in any other presidential race before this would have torpedoed a campaign. From commenting on pundit Megyn Kelly's "bleeding" to feuding with the pope, Trump has run the gamut of offenses. However, each blunder is less of a blunder and instead acts as a surge for Trump. That is his strength, and that is why he is unstoppable. Like a cancer, checkpoints and defenses that should have stopped Trump long ago have failed and instead his support multiplies and metastasizes across the country with staggering unpredictability. People like that Trump says what he wants, that he doesn't pander to outside interests. He represents a refreshing (?) change from the robotic establishment Republican nominees of the past like Mitt Romney, Newt Gingerich and John McCain. Trump's anti-establishment rhetoric is somewhat revolutionary, and thus unstoppable...

...For now. While Trump has bested his Republican foes, assuming he wins the nomination he will still have to face a democratic nominee next November. And while his gung-ho, tell-it-like-it-is strategy may appeal to the majority Republican demographic, he still has to win a majority of Americans--Democrats included. So while the runaway Trump train may be rolling its way to the RNC now, it has a long way to go before it reaches the White House.

TOW #17: The Perils of Presidentialism

The United States' government, with its executive, legislative and judicial branches always checking and balancing each other, is the pride of the patriotic American people. However, this government is more of a Frankenstein's Monster than an Adonis. In his 1996 essay, Professor of Political Science at Yale University Juan Linz reveals the perennial instability of presidential governments compared to their parliamentary counterparts. While it cannot be denied that there are some merits to the U.S's presidential government, it is historically obvious that America's presidential government is highly unstable.

Linz argues in his essay that the dissident powers of legislative and executive branches in the American government have long been a fault line in the U.S. government. This idea, which essentially points out the dangerous clash between the president and congress regarding who holds the democratic "power of the people" has been a long running theme in American government. During the presidency of accidental president Andrew Johnson, this political disparity almost destroyed the American political structure. Johnson disagreed heavily with the legislative majority Republicans regarding how to carry out Civil War Reconstruction. Johnson ignored the party's obvious majority opinion in the Senate and House and vetoed all bills passed by the party. Heavily annoyed by this stalemate, Republicans impeach Johnson on illegitimate grounds. Johnson was not removed from office and a crisis was averted; however, had he been removed it would have set a dangerous precedent that the legislature could remove the president at any time just because they didn't like his policy. Thus, the constant power struggle between the executive and legislative branches undermines the stability of the American Government.

Despite the relative instability of American Government, there are still benefits to the American political system. The constant checks and balances between the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches protect the country from polar decision making and excess political expediency. French philosopher Montesquieu believed that government needed checks and balances between its major institutions in order to ensure that no one interest could carry out highly polarized actions. The American system of government upholds this belief as the presidential veto, legislative power to pass bills, and judicial review allows all governmental decisions to be checked before being passed into law. This means that no rash decisions (hopefully) will be pushed through the government into law, but also means that almost nothing ever gets done. So while this system may provide necessary checks, it also is extremely inefficient and overall largely unstable.

America has thus far been able to operate with relative effectiveness under our current system of government. However, as Linz shows in his essay and as history has shown us, there are many faults in America's system that will inevitably lead to its downfall. The question that remains is when?